Advanced Techniques in Ecopath with Ecosim: Parameterization and Sensitivity AnalysisEcopath with Ecosim (EwE) is a widely used modeling suite for understanding trophic interactions, evaluating fisheries management options, and exploring ecosystem responses to environmental change. This article focuses on advanced techniques for parameterizing EwE models and for conducting rigorous sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. It is aimed at practitioners who already understand basic EwE concepts (mass-balance Ecopath models, dynamic Ecosim simulations, and spatial Ecospace implementations) and who want to improve model realism, robustness, and usefulness for management or research.
1. Goals of advanced parameterization and sensitivity analysis
Careful parameterization and sensitivity analysis help to:
- Increase confidence in model predictions by identifying influential parameters and structural assumptions.
- Prioritize data collection by revealing which parameters most affect outputs.
- Quantify uncertainty to support risk-based management decisions.
- Explore alternative plausible ecosystem configurations and hypotheses.
2. Preparing the model for advanced work
Before deep parameter tuning and sensitivity testing:
- Ensure the Ecopath mass-balance model is well-documented: trophic groups, biomasses, production/biomass (P/B), consumption/biomass (Q/B), diet composition, fisheries catches, and other flows must be traceable.
- Check mass-balance diagnostics: ecotrophic efficiencies (EE) in reasonable ranges, net production/consumption budgets, and no impossible negative flows.
- If possible, derive initial parameters from empirical studies, surveys, and the literature. Record data sources and uncertainty ranges.
- Consider grouping strategy carefully: overly coarse grouping masks dynamics; overly fine grouping inflates parameter uncertainty and computational complexity.
3. Advanced parameterization techniques
3.1. Bayesian and likelihood-based parameter estimation
- Use Bayesian approaches to formally combine prior information (from literature, experts) with data (time series of catches, biomass indices, diet, stomach contents). Bayesian methods produce posterior distributions for parameters, enabling probabilistic predictions.
- Implement likelihood functions for observed time-series (e.g., catch per unit effort, survey indices) and use Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or other sampling algorithms to explore parameter space.
- Tools: While EwE’s native interface doesn’t include full Bayesian MCMC, practitioners often couple EwE with external tools (R, Python) to run parameter estimation loops: run Ecosim forward with candidate parameters, compute likelihood vs. observed data, and iterate via MCMC or optimization routines.
3.2. Multi-objective fitting
- Fit multiple data types simultaneously (biomass indices, catch time series, diet fractions, size structure metrics). Weight data sources according to reliability.
- Multi-objective calibration can be done within optimization frameworks (e.g., simulated annealing, genetic algorithms) to find parameter sets that balance trade-offs among fit metrics.
3.3. Use of auxiliary data and structural constraints
- Incorporate diet-derived stomach content data and stable isotope analyses to constrain trophic link strengths.
- Use size-based information or life-history parameters to inform P/B and Q/B priors.
- Apply energetic consistency checks: ensure gross food requirements and assimilation efficiencies produce realistic mortality and growth patterns.
3.4. Time-varying parameters and forcing functions
- Allow parameters (e.g., vulnerability, primary productivity, migration rates) to vary through time as functions or forcing drivers (temperature, primary production anomalies, habitat change).
- Fit time-varying parameters using time series data to capture regime shifts or trends.
3.5. Ensemble modeling
- Produce ensembles of plausible models by sampling parameter space within realistic bounds (using Latin Hypercube Sampling, Sobol sequences, or random draws from priors).
- Run ensembles to examine distribution of outcomes rather than single deterministic forecasts.
4. Sensitivity analysis techniques
4.1. Local (one-at-a-time) sensitivity analysis
- Perturb each parameter by a small percentage (e.g., ±10%) and record response in key model outputs (biomass of target functional groups, catch, ecosystem indicators).
- Advantages: simple, fast, and identifies parameters with strong linear influence.
- Limitations: ignores interactions among parameters and non-linear effects.
4.2. Global sensitivity analysis
- Use variance-based methods (Sobol, FAST) to estimate contribution of each parameter to output variance across the full parameter space.
- Global methods quantify both main effects and interaction effects and are essential for non-linear, coupled models like EwE.
- Implementation typically requires many model runs; use high-performance computing or cloud resources as needed.
4.3. Screening methods
- Apply screening methods like Morris method to identify the most influential parameters cheaply before running more expensive global analyses.
4.4. Elasticity and relative sensitivity
- Compute elasticity: proportional change in output per proportional change in input. Elasticity highlights sensitivity relative to parameter magnitude and is helpful for comparing parameters with different units.
4.5. Structural sensitivity
- Test sensitivity to structural choices: group aggregation schemes, inclusion/exclusion of functional groups, alternative diet-matrix structures, and different formulations of fisheries selectivity or vulnerability.
- Structural sensitivity can be as important as parametric sensitivity and should be part of model uncertainty assessment.
5. Practical workflows and software integration
5.1. Coupling EwE to R or Python
- Use EwE’s Application Programming Interface (EwE4’s COM interface or newer APIs) to run models programmatically.
- Typical workflow: generate parameter sets in R/Python, call Ecosim runs for each set, extract outputs, compute fit or sensitivity metrics, and iterate.
- R packages (e.g., R2EwE — if available/updated) or custom scripts facilitate batch runs, automation, and statistical analysis.
5.2. Parallelization and computational considerations
- Use parallel processing to run ensembles or global sensitivity experiments. On multicore machines, distribute independent runs across cores.
- For very large ensembles or global analyses, use cluster or cloud computing (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud) and consider containerization (Docker) for reproducible environments.
5.3. Visualization and diagnostic tools
- Visualize parameter sensitivities (tornado plots, Sobol index bar charts), ensemble spread (confidence bands, quantile plots), and fit diagnostics (residuals, time-series overlays).
- Use network diagrams to explore how sensitive groups connect and propagate effects through the food web.
6. Interpreting results and communicating uncertainty
- Distinguish between parameter uncertainty (uncertainty in numeric inputs) and structural uncertainty (model formulation, grouping).
- Report ranges, confidence intervals, or credible intervals from ensembles or Bayesian posteriors rather than single-point forecasts.
- Translate sensitivity results into actionable recommendations: which data to collect next, which management options are robust across plausible models, and where model predictions are too uncertain for firm decisions.
7. Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
- Overfitting: avoid tuning parameters to match noise. Use cross-validation or withhold parts of time series for validation.
- Ignoring interactions: rely on global sensitivity methods when non-linear behaviors or trophic cascades are possible.
- Poor documentation: keep reproducible records of parameter sources, model versions, and scripts used for runs.
- Treating a single best-fit model as the truth: present ensembles and scenario ranges to reflect uncertainty.
8. Example workflow (concise)
- Assemble Ecopath base model with best-available data and uncertainty ranges.
- Define objectives and select calibration data (survey indices, catch time series).
- Use screening (Morris) to find influential parameters.
- Run global sensitivity (Sobol) across influential parameters to quantify contributions to output variance.
- If fitting, implement Bayesian/MCMC or multi-objective optimization to derive posterior parameter sets.
- Run ensembles of Ecosim projections under management scenarios and summarize distributions of outcomes.
- Communicate results with uncertainty bands and recommendations for monitoring priorities.
9. Final remarks
Advanced parameterization and rigorous sensitivity analysis strengthen EwE-based inference and make model results more credible for management. Combining modern statistical methods, computational power, and careful ecological judgment yields more informative and actionable ecosystem models.
Leave a Reply